In terms of raw performance, these two are evenly matched. The F900GS and Tiger 900 Alpine Edition produce nearly identical power figures, meaning the real-world difference will come down to gearing and torque delivery rather than peak horsepower. Both bikes share a similar footprint on the scale, with only a negligible 3kg difference between them, so handling characteristics will depend more on center-of-gravity than raw weight. Riders with a shorter inseam should lean towards the Tiger 900 Alpine Edition. Its seat height is 50mm lower than the F900GS, making it much easier to flat-foot at stoplights and increasing confidence during stops. Bottom Line: It's a close call. Choose the f900gs if you prefer its specific styling and ergonomics, or the tiger900 if you want the alternative brand character.
| Spec | F900GS | Tiger 900 Alpine Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Displacement | 895 | 888 |
| Power | 105 | 107 |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 |
| Weight | 219 | 222 |
| Seat height | 870 | 820 |