K 1200 RS 2002 vs K 1300 GT 2010
If straight-line speed is your priority, the K 1300 GT takes the lead. With 30 HP more than the K 1200 RS, it offers a more spirited ride that will be noticeable on highway overtakes or track days. Both bikes share a similar footprint on the scale, with only a negligible 3kg difference between them, so handling characteristics will depend more on center-of-gravity than raw weight. Riders with a shorter inseam should lean towards the K 1200 RS. Its seat height is 50mm lower than the K 1300 GT, making it much easier to flat-foot at stoplights and increasing confidence during stops. Bottom Line: While both are capable, the k1300gt offers a superior power-to-weight ratio, making it the more exciting machine for experienced riders.
| Spec | K 1200 RS | K 1300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Displacement | 1171 | 1293 |
| Power | 130 | 160 |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Weight | 285 | 288 |
| Seat height | 770 | 820 |