K 1200 RS 2002 vs FJR1300A 2013
If straight-line speed is your priority, the FJR1300A takes the lead. With 15 HP more than the K 1200 RS, it offers a more spirited ride that will be noticeable on highway overtakes or track days. Both bikes share a similar footprint on the scale, with only a negligible 4kg difference between them, so handling characteristics will depend more on center-of-gravity than raw weight. Riders with a shorter inseam should lean towards the K 1200 RS. Its seat height is 35mm lower than the FJR1300A, making it much easier to flat-foot at stoplights and increasing confidence during stops. Bottom Line: It's a close call. Choose the k1200rs if you prefer its specific styling and ergonomics, or the fjr1300 if you want the alternative brand character.
| Spec | K 1200 RS | FJR1300A |
|---|---|---|
| Displacement | 1171 | 1298 |
| Power | 130 | 145 |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Weight | 285 | 289 |
| Seat height | 770 | 805 |